Use of autobilevel ventilation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: An observational study
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-choice treatment for
obstructive sleep-disordered breathing. Automatic bilevel ventilation can be used to
treat obstructive sleep-disordered breathing when CPAP is ineffective, but clinical
experience is still limited. To assess the outcome of titration with CPAP and automatic
bilevel ventilation, the charts of 356 outpatients (obstructive sleep apnea,
n = 242; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease + obstructive sleep apnea overlap,
n = 80; obesity hypoventilation syndrome [OHS], n = 34; 103 females) treated for
obstructive sleep-disordered breathing from January 2014 to April 2017 were
reviewed. Positive airway pressure titration was considered successful in the case of
sleep-disordered breathing resolution (apnea-hypopnea index <10/hr) with cumulative
time at SaO2 < 90% (CT90%) <10% and/or improved daytime arterial blood
gases at the end of titration. CPAP was effective in 268 patients (75.0%). CPAP
treatment failure (n = 88) occurred in 13.6% of obstructive sleep apnea, 32.5% of
overlap, and 85.3% of OHS patients. Compared with successful CPAP cases,
patients undergoing the automatic bilevel ventilation trial showed higher body mass
index (39.3 ± 10.5 kg/m2 versus 34.8 ± 6.9 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), worse mean nocturnal
SaO2 (89.2 ± 4.0% versus 91.3± 4.0%, p < 0.003) and CT90%
(40.6 ± 28.6% versus 24.0 ± 23.3%), but similar age (62.8 ± 11.9 years versus
60.5 ± 12.0 years, p = 0.11), apnea-hypopnea index (39.4 ± 23.2/hr versus
41.0 21.2/hr, p = 0.55) and oxygen desaturation index (37.8 23.5/hr
versus 39.2 21.1/hr, p = 0.61) at diagnosis. Automatic bilevel ventilation was successful
in 79.5% of CPAP treatment failures (n = 70). Automatic bilevel ventilation
failure was independently associated with baseline body mass index >40 kg/m2
(odds ratio 6.16, confidence interval 1.50-25.17, p = 0.011) and CT90% >42% (odds
ratio 5.87, confidence interval 1.39-24.83, p = 0.016). During follow-up, automatic
bilevel ventilation treatment failed in seven patients (10%), and compliance was similar
in CPAP (4.5 ± 2.2 hr) and automatic bilevel ventilation (5.2 ± 2.3 hr, p = 0.09)
groups. Automatic bilevel ventilation was useful to treat sleep-disordered breathing,
but failed in patients with severe OHS.
Tipologia CRIS:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
ambulatory management; respiratory failure; non-invasive ventilation
Elenco autori:
Marrone, Oreste
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: