Inter-comparison of carbon content in PM10 and PM2.5 measured with two thermo-optical protocols in a Mediterranean site
Contributo in Atti di convegno
Data di Pubblicazione:
2019
Abstract:
Carbonaceous fraction of atmospheric particulate matter (PM), generally ranging between
20% and 50% of PM mass [1], is usually classified into organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon
(EC) and inorganic carbon (IC). The refractory light-absorbing component is called EC when
measured by thermo-optical methods or equivalent black carbon (eBC) when measured with
optical techniques. Quantification and characterization of carbonaceous particles are
important to understand aerosol sources and their impact on air quality, human health,
cultural heritage and climate. In fact, the European Directive 2008/50/EC requires the
measurement of EC and OC in the PM2.5 fraction of ambient PM in background areas.
A common widely used method is the thermo-optical transmittance (TOT), based on the
differentiation between EC/OC according to their thermal and optical properties, using
different protocols. Although a variety of inter-comparison studies of these standard
approaches have been performed, the distinction between EC and OC is still a challenging
problem [2], especially to maximize the comparability of results obtained in different sites. In
addition, comparability of optically determined eBC and thermo-optically determined EC is
also challenging because eBC and EC could vary by up to a factor 2 not only for the effect of
thermal treatment but also for variability induced by size distribution, mixing state, and
chemical composition [3,4,5].
In this work, a long-term campaign (January 2015-July 2016), was performed at the
Environmental-Climate Observatory of Lecce (SE Italy, 40°20'8"N-18°07'28"E, 37 m a.s.l.),
regional station of the Global Atmosphere Watch program (GAW-WMO) classified as an
urban background site [6]. 369 daily PM10 and PM2.5 samples were collected on quartz fibre
filters (Whatmann, 47 mm in diameter, pre-fired for 2h at 700°C) using an automatic sampler
(SWAM 5A Dual Channel Monitor, FAI Instruments srl). Simultaneous equivalent black
carbon (eBC) concentrations, only for the PM10 fraction, were measured using a Multi Angle
Absorption Photometer (MAAP Thermo Scientific, mod. 5012) operating at a wavelength of
?=670 nm using a constant mass absorption coefficient (MAC=6.6 m2/g). Punches of 1.0 cm2
were analysed for OC and EC determinations using a TOT method by a Sunset laboratory carbon analyser (Sunset Laboratory Inc., OR, USA) with two different standard thermal
protocols (NIOSH870 and EUSAAR2).
In summary, uncertainty of ~5% for TC and OC, compatible with the instrument
manufacturer uncertainties, and larger uncertainty (~10%) for EC for both thermal protocols
were found. Not statistically significant differences were found between the two protocols,
for both size fractions, in TC and OC determinations. Contrarily, EC results obtained with
EUSAAR2 were higher than that obtained with NIOSH870, with a difference of 19% and 33%
for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. These values have a clear seasonal variability due to
different combustion sources acting during cold (autumn and winter) seasons (road traffic
and biomass burning). EC/TC ratios were larger for EUSAAR2 in both size fractions (23% for
PM10 and 32% for PM2.5), especially in the warm period (spring and summer). Differently, on
average, OC/EC ratio derived from NIOSH870 was larger than obtained by EUSAAR2, being
dependent on the medium-low temperature protocol.
SOC (Secondary Organic Carbon), estimated by EC-tracer method, has larger values during
cold seasons, without differences between the two protocols used. The contribution of SOC
to TC is essentially the same with both protocols and fractions, while SOC/OC is equal to
about 51% (Figure 1) with no seasonality. Good correlation (0.83
Tipologia CRIS:
04.01 Contributo in Atti di convegno
Keywords:
NIOSH870; EUSAAR2; Thermo-optical analysis; Carbonaceous PM; EC/OC; eBC
Elenco autori:
Gambaro, Andrea; Merico, Eva; Dinoi, Adelaide; Guascito, MARIA RACHELE; Contini, Daniele; Cesari, Daniela; Barbaro, Elena
Link alla scheda completa: