Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo CNR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo CNR

|

UNI-FIND

cnr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Technology alternatives for tapping the pruning residue resource

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2013
abstract:
Four commercial harvesters were compared with respect to recovery of pruning residues for energy conversion. These harvesters were tested side-by-side on 17 test fields, totaling 15. ha. The test fields consisted of vineyards and apple and pear orchards. The residue yield was between 0.7 and 9 green tonne per hectare, at a moisture content from 37% to 48%. Yield was highest for the orchards, and lowest for vineyards. Harvesters collected the residues and moved them to the roadside at a cost of between 11 and 60EUR per green tonne, depending on field conditions and technology choice. Single-pass harvesting was the cheapest, especially if applied through a dedicated tractor and a towed unit with a large integral container. Two-pass harvesting was the most flexible, but also the most expensive: it should be favored only when space, weather or other management constraints limit the application of the other systems. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Biomass; Energy; Harvesting; Vineyards
List of contributors:
Magagnotti, Natascia; Picchi, Gianni; Spinelli, Raffaele
Authors of the University:
MAGAGNOTTI NATASCIA
PICCHI GIANNI
SPINELLI RAFFAELE
Handle:
https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/245127
Published in:
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84870894926&partnerID=q2rCbXpz
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0 | Sorgente dati: PREPROD (Ribaltamento disabilitato)