Publication Date:
2022
abstract:
Ancient environmental DNA retrieved from sedimentary records (sedaDNA) can complement fossil-morphological approaches for char-
acterizing Quaternary biodiversity changes. PCR-based DNA metabarcoding is so far the most widely used method in environmental DNA
studies, including sedaDNA. However, degradation of ancient DNA and potential contamination, together with the PCR amplification
drawbacks, have to be carefully considered. Here we tested this approach on speleothems from an Alpine cave that, according to a previous
palynomorphological study, have shown to contain abundant pollen grains. This offers a unique opportunity for comparing the two meth-
ods and, indirectly, trying to validate DNA-based results. The plant taxa identified by sedaDNA are fewer than those by pollen analysis, and
success rate of PCR replicates is low. Despite extensive work performed following best practice for sedaDNA, our results are suboptimal and
accompanied by a non-negligible uncertainty. Our preliminary data seem to indicate that paleoenvironmental DNA may be isolated from
speleothems, but the intrinsic weakness of PCR-based metabarcoding poses a challenge to its exploitation. We suggest that newly developed
methods such as hybridization capture, being free from PCR drawbacks and offering the opportunity to directly assess aDNA authenticity,
may overcome these limitations, allowing a proper exploitation of speleothems as biological archives.
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Speleothems; SedaDNA; PCR-based eDNA metabarcoding; Contamination; Authenticity
List of contributors:
Marchesini, Alexis
Published in: