Quantitative ultrasound criteria for risk stratification in clinical practice: a comparative assessment.
Academic Article
Publication Date:
2012
abstract:
Abstract: This study aimed to compare two different classifications of the risk of fracture/osteoporosis(OP) based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Analyses were based on data from the Epidemiological Study on the Prevalence of Osteoporosis, a cross-sectional study conducted in 2000 aimed at assessing the risk of OP in a representative sample of the Italian population. Subjects were classified into 5 groups considering the cross-classification found in previous studies; logistic regression models were defined separately for women and men to study the fracture risk attributable to groups defined by the cross-classification, adjusting for traditional risk factors. Eight-thousand six-hundred eighty-one subjects were considered in the analyses. Logistic regression models revealed that the two classifications seem to be able to identify a common core of individuals at low and at high risk of fractures, and the importance of a multidimensional assessment in older patients to evaluate clinical risk factors together with a simple, inexpensive, radiation-free device such as QUS. (E-mail: marianna.noale@in.cnr.it) (C) 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Quantitative heel ultrasound; Osteoporosis risk; Fracture risk; Risk factors; ESOPO study
List of contributors:
Crepaldi, Gaetano; Maggi, Stefania; Noale, Marianna; Limongi, Federica
Published in: