Data di Pubblicazione:
2004
Abstract:
The main aim of this paper is to highlight that, when dealing with DG methods for linear
hyperbolic equations or advection-dominated equations, it is much more convenient to
write the upwind numerical
ux as the sum of the usual (symmetric) average and a
jump penalty. The equivalence of the two ways of writing is certainly well known (see
e.g. Ref. 4); yet, it is very widespread not to consider upwinding, for DG methods, as a
stabilization procedure, and too often in the literature the upwind form is preferred in
proofs. Here, we wish to underline the fact that the combined use of the formalism of
Ref. 3 and the jump formulation of upwind terms has several advantages. One of them
is, in general, to provide a simpler and more elegant way of proving stability. The second
advantage is that the calibration of the penalty parameter to be used in the jump term is
left to the user (who can think of taking advantage of this added freedom), and the third
is that, if a diusive term is present, the two jump stabilizations (for the generalized
upwinding and for the DG treatment of the diusive term) are often of identical or very
similar form, and this can also be turned to the user's advantage.
Tipologia CRIS:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Brezzi, Franco
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: