Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo CNR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo CNR

|

UNI-FIND

cnr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Effect of Renal Artery Stenting on Left Ventricular Mass: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2012
abstract:
BACKGROUND: Whether renal revascularization reduces left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with coronary artery disease is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial testing the effect of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy progression in patients affected by ischemic heart disease and renal artery stenosis. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Incident patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization with renal artery stenosis >50%-<=80%. INTERVENTION: Revascularization plus standard medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. OUTCOMES: Primary end point was change in echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and echocardiographic studies were performed at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS: 84 patients were randomly assigned: 43 to revascularization plus standard medical therapy and 41 to medical therapy alone. At baseline, clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 study groups. After 1 year, there was no statistically significant difference between longitudinal change in the medical therapy group versus that in the medical therapy plus revascularization group for LVMI (2.1; 95% CI, -6.1 to 10.3 g/m(2)), blood pressure (systolic, -0.2 [95% CI, -9.1 to 8.8 mm Hg]; diastolic, -3.3 [95% CI, -8.4 to 1.8 mm Hg]), or estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.5; 95% CI, -5.8 to 8.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The number of major cardiovascular events was similar in the 2 groups (revascularization plus standard medical therapy [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11] and medical therapy alone [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11]). LIMITATIONS: Patients with very severe renal artery stenosis were excluded from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was unable to detect a clinically significant benefit of renal revascularization on LVMI in patients with coronary artery disease and renal artery stenosis of 50%-80%
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Renal artery stenosis; left ventricular hypertrophy; coronary artery disease
List of contributors:
Tripepi, GIOVANNI LUIGI
Authors of the University:
TRIPEPI GIOVANNI LUIGI
Handle:
https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/305972
Published in:
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0 | Sorgente dati: PREPROD (Ribaltamento disabilitato)