Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo CNR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo CNR

|

UNI-FIND

cnr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Natural subsidence of the Venice area during the last 60 Myr.

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2007
abstract:
Integrated geohistory analysis performed on high-resolution stratigraphy ofVenezia1andLido1wells (Quaternary^Pliocene interval) and low-resolution stratigraphy of a simulatedwell extending Lido 1 down to the base of Cenozoic (Palaeocene^Miocene interval) is used to reconstruct the interplay between subsidence and sedimentation that occurred in theVenice area (eastern Po Plain) during the last 60Myr, and to discuss the relationships between calculated subsidence rates and time resolution of stratigraphic data. Both subsidence and sedimentation are mostly related to the tectonic evolution of the belts that surround theVenice basin, in£uencing the lithosphere vertical motions and the input of clastic sediments through time. In particular, two subsidence phases are recorded between 40^33.5 and 32.5^24Myr (0.13 and 0.14mmyear1, respectively), coeval with tectonic phases in theDinaric belt.Vice versa, during the main South-Alpine orogenic phase (middle^lateMiocene), quiescence or little uplift ( 0.03mmyear1) re£ects the location of theVenice area close to the peripheral bulge of the South-Alpine foreland system. Early Pliocene evolution is characterised by a number of subsidence/uplift events, among which two uplifts occurred between 5^4.5 and 3^2.2Myr (at 0.4 and 0.2mmyear1, respectively) and can be correlated with tectonic motions in the Apennines. During the last million years, theVenice areawas initially characterised by uplift ( 0.6mmyear1 rising to 1.5mmyear1 between 0.4 and 0.38Myr), eventually replaced by subsidence at a rate ranging between1.6 and1.0mmyear1up to 0.12Myr and then decreased to 0.4mmyear1, as an average, up to present. Our results highlight that time resolution of the stratigraphic dataset deeply in£uences the order of magnitude obtained for the calculated subsidence rate.This is because subsidence seems to have worked through short-lived peaks (in the order of105 years), alternating with long relatively quiescent intervals.This suggests caution when components of subsidence are deduced by subtracting long-term to short-term subsidence rate.
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Asioli, Alessandra
Authors of the University:
ASIOLI ALESSANDRA
Handle:
https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/41542
Published in:
BASIN RESEARCH
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-BRE.html
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0 | Sorgente dati: PREPROD (Ribaltamento disabilitato)