Genetic interference reduces the evolvability of modular and nonmodular visual neural networks.

The aim of this paper is to propose an interdisciplinary evolutionary connectionism approach for the study of the evolution of modularity. It is argued that neural networks as a model of nervous system and genetic algorithms as simulative models of biological evolution would allow us to formulate a clear and operative definition of module and to simulate the different evolutionary scenarios proposed for the origin of modularity. I will present a recent model in which the evolution of primate cortical visual streams is possible starting from non-modular neural networks. Simulation results not only confirm the existence of the phenomenon of neural interference in non-modular network architectures but also, for the first time, reveal the existence of another kind of interference at the genetic level, i.e. genetic interference, a new population genetic mechanism that is independent from the network architecture. Our simulations clearly show that genetic interference reduces the evolvability of visual neural networks and sexual reproduction can at least partially solve the problem of genetic interference. Finally, it is shown that entrusting the task of finding the neural network architecture to evolution and that of finding the network connection weights to learning is a way to completely avoid the problem of genetic interference. On the basis of this evidence, it is possible to formulate a new hypothesis on the origin of structural modularity, and thus to overcome the traditional dichotomy between innatist and empiricist theories of mind.