Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo CNR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo CNR

|

UNI-FIND

cnr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Assessment and clinical validation of margins for adaptive simultaneous integrated boost in neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2015
abstract:
PURPOSE: An adaptive concomitant boost (ACB) for the neo-adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer was clinically implemented. In this study population margins M(90,90) considering rectal deformation were derived for 10 consecutive patients treated at 18 × 2.3Gy with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and prospectively validated on 20 additional patients treated with HT, delivering ACB in the last 6 fractions. METHODS: Sectorial margins M(90,90) of the whole and second treatment parts were assessed for 90% population through a method combining the 90% coverage probability maps of rectal positions (CPC90%) with 3D local distance measurements between the CPC90% and a reference rectal contour. M(90,90) were compared with the margins M(90,90)95%/99%, ensuring CPC90% coverage with 95%/99% confidence level. M(90,90) of the treatment second part were chosen as ACB margins which were clinically validated for each patient by means of %volume missing of CPC5/6 excluded by the ACB margins. RESULTS: The whole treatment M(90,90) ranged between 1.9 mm and 9 mm in the lower-posterior and upper-anterior sectors, respectively. Regarding ACB, M(90,90) were 7 mm in the anterior direction and <5 mm elsewhere. M(90,90)95%/99% did not significantly differ from M(90,90). The %volume excluded by the ACB margin was<2% for all male and <5% for 9/10 female patients. The dosimetry impact on R_adapt for the patients with the largest residual error was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Local deformation measurements confirm an anisotropic motion of rectum once set-up error is rigidly corrected. Margins of 7 mm anterior and 5 mm elsewhere are adequate for ACB. Female patients show a slightly larger residual error.
Iris type:
01.01 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Rectal cancer; Margins; Adaptive radiotherapy; Tomotherapy
List of contributors:
Scalco, Elisa; Rizzo, Giovanna
Authors of the University:
RIZZO GIOVANNA
SCALCO ELISA
Handle:
https://iris.cnr.it/handle/20.500.14243/262062
Published in:
PHYSICA MEDICA (TESTO STAMP.)
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0 | Sorgente dati: PREPROD (Ribaltamento disabilitato)